Skip to Content, Features, Homepage
  • Phone 1800 643 893
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Request Appointment

Case studies

Clive and Julie

Russell and Yvette's Story

Slide 1

About Russell (50) & Yvette (49)

Goal: To retire in ten years

Russell is employed full-time and earns $70,000 p.a.

Yvette is employed part-time and earns $35,000 p.a.

Home loan of $170,000

 

Pay $1,250 in repayments per month on their home loan

 

Russell can save $5,000 p.a.

Slide 2

What are Russell and Yvette's options?

Direct surplus income to paying off their mortgage

Russell and Yvette can reduce their mortgage debt and obtain a known return by paying surplus income into their mortgage. To achieve an equivalent result to their current financial position, their investments would need to achieve the same after-tax return as their mortgage interest rate. However, they could be subject to interest rate rises over the long term.

This strategy gives Russell and Yvette greater certainty over their mortgage. The estimated interest saving is $70,000 and additional payments will reduce the loan period by approximately nine and a half years.

 

 

 

Slide 3

Direct surplus income into their super

Russell could contribute surplus income to super through a salary sacrifice arrangement, which would  provide a tax‑effective outcome. His super should benefit from the investment returns that can be obtained from long‑term savings as well as from increased contributions.

Due to the tax-effectiveness of this strategy, Russell’s surplus income of $5,000 per annum would be equivalent to approximately $7,350 in pre-tax super contributions. His super would be approximately $120,000 greater at retirement than it would have been if they had used their surplus income to repay debt only.

Although their loan would be approximately $70,000 higher at retirement under this strategy, this is still a net gain of $50,000. Russell would also be obtaining approximately $2,350 per annum in taxation savings (approximately $23,500 over ten years).

 

Slide 4

Their decision

After weighing up their options, their Q Invest Adviser explains that considering their circumstances, it is appropriate for Russell to salary sacrifice his surplus income into super. Russell and Yvette are on track to retire in ten years.

Russell and Yvette understand and are comfortable knowing their superannuation contributions are not fully accessible until retirement. They are also aware of the potential for volatility in returns. With the potential for a larger superannuation balance, Russell is prepared to take on some risk with his superannuation investment.

Remember, when Russell and Yvette are 60, they will have tax-free access to their super upon retirement.

This case study has been prepared by Q Invest Limited (ABN 35 063 511 580 AFSL 238274) and is for general information only. It does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these before you make any investment decision based on this information.

 

Clive and Julie

Clive and Julie's Story

Slide 1

About Clive (49) & Julie (48)

Goal: To be financially secure in the event the unexpected happens

Clive is employed full-time and earns $78,000 p.a.

Julie is employed part-time and earns $32,000 p.a.

Home loan of $150,000

Two school aged children

Do they have sufficient insurance to pay off their debts and meet current expenses should either spouse pass away or be permanently disabled?

Slide 2

Clive and Julie are in their late ‘40s, they have a home loan debt of $150,000 and two children at school.  Clive is working full-time and earns $78,000 per annum and Julie is working three days a week and earns $32,000 per annum.

They have minimal surplus income due to their home loan, children’s education expenses and other living costs.  However, both realise they need to review their insurance requirements so they are prepared for the unexpected.

They decide to seek financial advice and attend a meeting with a Q Invest Financial Adviser.

At their meeting their Adviser highlights the potential impact on their financial stability should either Clive or Julie pass away or suffer disability prior to retirement.  Clive and Julie are surprised to know that they don’t have sufficient cover within their respective QSuper accounts to repay their debt should either of them die or should either suffer disability and be unable to continue working.

Their Adviser points out that they both have a total of four units of Death and total and permanent disability (TPD) cover within each of their QSuper accounts.  As both are contributing 5% to their superannuation accounts they are provided the “standard” rate on insurance cover.

Clive and Julie’s Death and TPD cover within QSuper is $90,800 and $102,800 respectively.  In addition to this, they each have Income Protection cover which would replace 75 % of their income for a period of up to two years.  

Clive and Julie realise that should either pass away then the surviving spouse would not be earning sufficient to continue meeting their living and lifestyle expenditure especially with two children at school.

Slide 3

What are Clive and Julie's options?

 

Debt repayment

Clive and Julie can increase their Death and TPD cover to ensure their home loan debt is repaid in the event of either spouse passing away or disability at a minimum.  This would mean an increase in Clive and Julie’s cover of approximately three units and two units respectively.  At a cost of $1 per week per unit this is a minimal outlay (for a large return) for the certainty it provides should a major life changing event occur.

Their Adviser also explains that they may need to consider increasing their Death and TPD cover outside superannuation to provide sufficient capital for them to continue meeting their children’s education costs and living expenditure.  This is recommended as Clive and Julie will only receive replacement of their income for a period of up to two years.  They will therefore need to consider how they will replace their income for the remaining time until retirement.

Replacement income

Clive could also consider establishing additional income protection through an external insurance provider in order to have replacement income (of up to 75%) until he turns age 65.  Julie may be unable to obtain additional income protection in this manner as she is employed on a part-time basis and may not meet the minimum work hours required by most insurers to obtain income protection.  For Julie, her Adviser considers TPD cover as a way of covering this shortfall.

Slide 4

Their decision

After reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of holding personal insurance cover within their superannuation, Clive and Julie have decided to increase their insurance coverage within their superannuation.  For them, the benefits of generally lower premiums compared to establishing cover via and external provider outweighs the potential tax implication on withdrawing their funds from superannuation in the event of disability.  

Both Clive and Julie are comfortable with this additional cost to their expenditure as their Adviser also recommends that Clive make pre-tax contributions to his superannuation and Julie make after-tax contributions to her superannuation to assist in meeting this additional insurance cost.  By doing this, Julie will also be eligible to receive the federal government super co-contribution benefit by making these post-tax contributions.  

Continuing to meet their ongoing lifestyle expenses should the unexpected occur is very important to Clive and Julie.  The additional cover income protection provides, gives them peace of mind they will be able to continue to live comfortably should either Clive or Julie not be able to continue working.  

By implementing their Adviser’s recommendations, Clive and Julie are confident that if they were unable to continue working should either of them pass away or suffer a disability, they would have sufficient income to maintain their financial commitments and lifestyle.  

Notes:

Clive age 49, Julie age 48 with one unit for Death and TPD valued at $22,700 and $25,700 respectively.

Both contributing standard 5% contributions to superannuation.

This case study has been prepared by Q Invest Limited (ABN 35 063 511 580 AFSL 238274) and is for general information only. It does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these before you make any investment decision based on this information.

 

Jane

Jane's Story

Slide 1

About Jane (48)

Goal: Understand her investment options inside and outside of superannuation

Income $60,000 per annum

Jane is 48 and with retirement some time in the next 10 years she is considering her options for investment.  She has read articles relating to the benefits of contributing to superannuation but is also concerned that superannuation rule changes may impact on when she can access her superannuation money. 

She decides to seek advice from a Q Invest Financial Adviser to set her on the right path.  Her Adviser reviews her current cashflow position and together they agree that Jane is able to save approximately $7,000 per annum.  During her meeting Jane advised that she would like to retire at age 55 on an income of approximately $28,000 per annum. 

Her Adviser explains to Jane that her preservation age is 57, which means she is generally unable to access her superannuation funds until that age following her proposed retirement.  As a result Jane needs to consider how she will fund her retirement income from age 55 (her desired retirement age) to age 57 (when she can access her superannuation).

Slide 2

What are Jane's options?

Salary sacrifice into superannuation

Jane’s Adviser reviews with her the advantages and disadvantages of investing in and outside of superannuation.   A strategy option for Jane is to increase her contributions to superannuation via a salary sacrifice arrangement and utilises the remainder of her surplus income to contribute towards a managed fund.

Regular managed fund savings plan

An option for Jane’s surplus income could be used towards commencing a regular savings plan into a managed fund.  Jane could use her cash savings to kick-start her investment and to continue contributing a fixed monthly amount towards her new investment portfolio.  After reviewing her risk profile Jane is advised to invest in a growth orientated portfolio.  She understands the potential risks with this investment such as short-term market volatility and potential capital fluctuations.

Slide 3

Jane's decision:

Jane decides to undertake a combination of increased salary sacrifice contributions and commencing a regular managed fund savings plan. 

Jane’s Adviser recommends using $2,000 of her surplus income towards pre-tax contributions to superannuation and given Jane’s marginal tax rate (including Medicare levy) of 31.5% her actual gross contributions are equivalent to approximately $2,900 per annum. 

Her remaining $5,000 per annum surplus is used to begin a regular savings plan into a managed fund.  Jane is advised to use existing cash savings of $6,000 to kick-start her investment and to contribute $416 per month towards her new investment portfolio. 

Jane’s managed funds portfolio at age 55 is estimated at approximately $57,100 and is considered to be sufficient to meet her $28,000 per annum income need until she turns age 57.  Jane’s contributions to her investment total $41,000 over the 7 years including her initial lump sum investment of $6,000. 

At age 57 Jane could access her superannuation to continue meeting her income needs for the long-term given she has also been contributing to her superannuation along the way. 

Of course over the two years from age 55 to age 57 her managed funds portfolio would continue to be invested so therefore she may be able to continue drawing income from her managed funds portfolio for longer or draw additional income if required.

 

Notes:

Rate of return for Growth managed funds portfolio and superannuation – 8% per annum

MTR – 31.5%

Capital gains tax not taken into consideration given gradual drawdown from investment at retirement and given Jane is likely to be retired at that time

Jane’s current superannuation - $100,000 – Accumulation account

Jane’s income $60,000 pa

5% contributions = $3,000 per annum

This case study has been prepared by Q Invest Limited (ABN 35 063 511 580 AFSL 238274) and is for general information only. It does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these before you make any investment decision based on this information.

Clive and Julie

Alice's Story

Slide 1

About Alice (62)

Goal: To ensure that in the event of death, the remainder of Alice’s QSuper Pension account is passed on to her adult children in the most tax-effective way.

Alice is single and permanetly retired.  She has $400,000 in a QSuper Pension account with 10% of the Pension account currently tax-free.

Slide 2 A

What are Alice's options?

Currently Alice has $400,000 in her QSuper Pension account. $40,000 of this benefit is tax-free, with the remainder being subject to tax. Alice understands that the taxable component is taxed at 16.5% including Medicare Levy when it is received by non-dependent beneficiaries like financially independent adult children on death. 

On Alice’s current balance, her children would pay 16.5% tax and Medicare Levy on 90% (or $360,000) of her benefit.  This equates to around $59,400 in tax being paid, significantly impacting the value of her benefit to her children on her death.  There is no tax payable by non-dependent beneficiaries on the tax-free component paid from superannuation on death. 

 

Slide 3

Withdraw and re-contribute a portion of the account balance

Alice sought advice from a Q Invest Financial Adviser to implement a strategy that reduced the potential tax payable by beneficiaries of an estate on superannuation benefits by increasing the amount of tax-free component within the account. This strategy could save Alice’s children up to $59,400 in tax and Medicare Levy based on her current account balance. 

As Alice is over age 60 there is no tax payable on the withdrawal of a lump sum from the superannuation environment.  Alice is also eligible to contribute to superannuation as she is under age 65 and not required to meet a work test. 

The amount of tax and Medicare Levy that Alice’s children could save would be dependent on the amount that Alice withdraws as a lump sum and re-contributes as a non-concessional contribution to a new accumulation account.  If Alice was to withdraw:

$150,000 this would increase her tax-free component to 43.7% of her benefit

$300,000 this would increase her tax-free component to 77.5% of her benefit

$398,000 (leaving $2,000 to maintain membership) this would increase her tax-free component to 99% of her benefit

 

The amount Alice is able to re-contribute depends on any past non-concessional contributions Alice has made that may have triggered the 3 year bring forward rule already.  If this is the case, then Alice can only contribute the amount that will keep her within the limit of $450,000.  If Alice has not made any past contributions within the last 3 years, then she is able to make use of the bring forward rule and contribute the maximum amount to superannuation.

Slide 4

Alice's decision

Alice chooses to withdraw and then re-contribute $398,000 to her QSuper Pension account as this would represent the maximum tax saving to her adult children on the payment of her remaining QSuper Pension upon her death and she has not made any non-concessional contributions in the previous two financial years or the current financial year.

This case study has been prepared by Q Invest LImited (ABN 35 063 511 580 AFSL 238274) and is for general information only.  It does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situations or needs. You should consider these before you make any investment decision based on this information.

 

 

Clive and Julie

Joan's Story

Slide 1

About Joan (70)

Goal: Joan is receiving a comfortable level of income from her assets and the Aged Pension and would like to know how to change where her income is drawn from to leave more tax efficient assets for her children in her estate and potentially improve her Centrelink entitlements over time.

Joan's has a QSuper Pension account with a balance of $250,000

Joan implemented a strategy at retirement to maximise the tax free component (95%) within her QSuper Pension account for estate planning purposes

She has been primarily income tested for Centrelink Aged Pension and receiving a part aged pension

She has assets invested outside superannuation include cash, term deposits, a managed fund and direct shares

Slide 2

What are Joan's options?

Take no action

With the recent market volatility Joan is drawing a higher proportion of her superannuation assets as income than she has in the past.  By doing nothing Joan may erode the tax free component within her QSuper Pension account quicker and leave less superannuation and more of other taxable non-superannuation investment assets to her adult children as part of her estate.  Doing nothing will not achieve Joan’s objectives.

Slide 3

Reduce pension income and draw income needs from other assets

Centrelink assess purchased superannuation income streams like the QSuper Pension account under both the income and the assets test.  100% of the pension account balance is assessed under the asset test and part of the income is assessed under the income test.  The income amount that is assessed is the income over the Centrelink Deductible Amount (DA) based on the commencement value of the pension and the life expectancy of the primary pensioner or a reversionary beneficiary, if any.  The Centrelink DA is the amount of income excluded from the income test.

The Centrelink DA is calculated by: 

Original Purchase Price less residual capital value less commutations

Longest life expectancy at commencement 

With the current market volatility, Joan’s current account balance has reduced with negative market growth.  However, the Centrelink DA has remained unchanged as it is based on a fixed commencement value.  Conversely, when there is positive market growth this growth does not change the Centrelink Deductible amount of the allocated pension. 

In Joan’s case, she is single and commenced the QSuper Pension account 10 years ago with $400,000 at retirement.  Joan’s Centrelink DA is $17,079 per annum.  Assuming Joan has made no lump sum withdrawals from her account her Centrelink DA would be the same today. 

Joan is currently drawing an income of $25,000 per annum from her QSuper Pension account.  Therefore the amount above the Centrelink DA of $17,079 is assessable income under the income test, representing $7,921 per annum.  Joan also has deemed income from investment assets outside superannuation.

As Joan is primarily income tested, one way to improve Joan’s Age Pension benefit would be to reduce the amount of assessable income from the QSuper Pension account.  However, Joan would like to maintain the same level of income to maintain her current lifestyle.  Therefore if Joan reduced her QSuper Pension account income she could top up her income by way of capital withdrawals from her investment assets to meet the short fall in her regular pension income.  As Joan is a Senior Australian she may be eligible for tax offsets, like the Senior Australians Tax Offset, to help her with any capital gains tax that may be payable on selling certain investment assets.  This strategy will help Joan to preserve money within her QSuper Pension account which is tax free on her death to her adult children. 

Slide 4

Joan's decision

Joan seeks the advice from her Q Invest financial planner in consultation with her tax adviser to make capital withdrawals from her investments assets over time without creating large tax liabilities.  As a consequence, Joan receives an improved level of the Aged Pension from Centrelink and has the potential to improve the tax position of her estate to her adult children in the future. 

This case study has been prepared by Q Invest Limited (ABN 35 063 511 580 AFSL 238274) and is for general information only. It does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these before you make any investment decision based on this information.

Kevin and Sally's Story

Slide 1

About Kevin (57) & Sally (55)

Goal: To pay of existing debts as soon as possible

Kevin - $320,000 in an account-based pension

Sally - $270,000 in an account-based pension

 

10% of current pension funds are tax-free

 

Existing debt of $150,000 (mortgage, car loan and credit card)

 

Slide 2

What are Kevin and Sally's options?

Make lump sum withdrawals from their super now.

To pay out existing debts, Kevin and Sally would need to withdraw almost $88,100 each to receive an after-tax lump sum of $75,000 each.

They need to keep in mind they have both used their low rate cap and would be required to pay tax at 15% (plus Medicare levy) on the taxable amount withdrawn.

If Kevin and Sally withdraw a lump sum from their super to pay their outstanding debts, the interest saved would be approximately $66,800 and would reduce the loan period by ten years. This strategy would use a large amount of Kevin and Sally’s retirement savings now and leave a smaller balance for their future lifestyle. In addition, they will pay tax on the withdrawal.

Increase their pension income to accelerate debt repayments.

Another option for Kevin and Sally is to increase their monthly pension payments to repay the debt sooner. Most of the income from their pension is taxable, as they are both under age 60. The tax payable on the income stream is at marginal tax rates(plus Medicare levy) less a superannuation pension tax offset of 15% on the taxable portion.

If Kevin and Sally increase their after-tax pension payment by $500 each (per month), they will be able to repay their mortgage in five years instead of ten years.

They will save approximately $28,400 in interest. The consequence of this strategy for Kevin and Sally is that they will use more of their retirement savings and leave less available for their future lifestyle. In addition, they may pay more tax on their income.

 

 

 

Slide 3

Restructure (consolidate) their debts to reduce interest and repay debts sooner

To reduce their total interest bill and make their position more manageable, Kevin and Sally could consolidate all their debts into their home loan at one low interest rate. To repay their mortgage sooner, they need to maintain the same level of repayments.

By consolidating their debts into their mortgage with the same level of repayments, Kevin and Sally would save approximately $11,800 and reduce the total loan period by approximately two years and two months, without paying any additional tax.

Their decision

Kevin and Sally think restructuring their debts to reduce interest and repay debts sooner is the best option for them, as this option will not affect their superannuation balance, and it will not change their current income needs or cost them any additional tax.

Important Information: This article has been prepared by Q Invest Limited (ABN 35 063 511 580 AFSL 238274) and is for general information only. It does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these before you make any investment decision based on this information.